Beta

Password Reset Confirmation

If an account matching the email you entered was found, you will receive an email with a link to reset your password.

Welcome to our Beta

The Advocates of Self-Government is preparing a new experience for our users.

User Not Found

The username/email and password combination you entered was not found. Please try again or contact support.

Skip to main content

Quizzes & Apps

Articles

Author: The Libertarian Homeschooler

What are rights?

What are rights?

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. Editor’s Note: This was written to introduce the idea of rights to the Young Statesman. What are rights? There are two types or rights: Negative rights and positive rights. If you’ve ever heard the Ten Commandments, you’re familiar with Negative Rights. Thou shalt not…. Negative rights make you refrain from encroaching on the person or property of another. RightsThou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not steal. Or as Libertarians like to say: Do not encroach upon the person or property of another. Simple, no? These rights don’t require you to Do anything. Only to refrain. A negative right essentially protects you from the encroachment of another person, a group, and the State. The negative right tells you that you can expect not to be subject to violence or coercion. Negative rights are based on the idea of ownership. You own yourself and you own your property. No one has the right to infringe upon your life or your liberty or your property because they properly belong to you. For a negative right to be violated, one person, group, or State must encroach upon another. (Thou shalt not kill apparently doesn’t apply to tornadoes or earthquakes so if you’re killed by a tornado we don’t say that your rights have been violated.) If you’ve ever heard someone argue that all people have the right to healthcare, education, food, shelter, or clothing they were making an argument for Positive rights. Positive rights make everyone responsible for providing one another with goods, services, and resources. Positive rights negate the principle of ownership. Every single argument for Positive rights without exception, no matter how kindly intended or reasonable, is an attack on self ownership and property. Positive rights are based on the principle that we do Not own ourselves nor do we own our property. Therefore access to the property and person of another without their consent–theft and servitude–is fair and reasonable. Positive rights require that you Do something. This is a violation of the principle of self-ownership. If I own myself, I am not required to Do anything at the behest of another. A Positive right guarantees the encroachment of another person, a group, and the State against your person and property. You will be subject to violence and coercion if you violate the right of another to your labor and property. Constitutionally, the preservation of Negative rights is the purview of the State. Negative rights are ancient and history has shown that despots violate them first by claiming the ‘general welfare’ or ‘common good’ is being served and after establishing that the people will tolerate their breach they will do away with them in all but name.

Education Theater

Education Theater

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. I think education is a natural system that can’t be centrally planned. And yet, that’s exactly what we try to do with curriculum-and-textbook-based learning. Scope, sequence, grading children by age, all of that is done not for the sake of the child but for the sake of efficiently delivering lessons aimed at imparting skills and knowledge. We have the best intentions, but what is it getting us? Theater-EducationWhat we’re finding is that we can throw skills and knowledge at them but unless it’s on the child’s timeline, when they’re interested, when it matters to them, it doesn’t stick. We’re wasting all kinds of time, effort, and patience re-teaching things that we taught when children weren’t interested or ready. We’re frustrating children and what we’re really teaching them is that education is an absurd, arbitrary exercise in memorizing what someone else deems worthy and promptly forgetting it once the test is over. This is a false efficiency. This is education theater. Worse yet, perhaps, we ignore the individual’s strengths, genius, needs, desires, capacities, and dreams when we attempt to be efficient and to impose ‘education’ on them. What they’re really doing is creating themselves and I think in the best of all worlds the people who love them the most should be resources or facilitators or mentors in that process. Sometimes it seems to me that education is like a bad present. We’re shoved into the dreaded Christmas cardigan from Aunty Hortence and told to go thank her when what we really wanted, what we really needed, was the bike.

What Makes Sense?

What Makes Sense?

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. Editors Note: If not for homeschooling, BA would most likely not get the individualized attention that he needs in a regular, public school. BA (9) is on a quest for full-on literacy: reading, writing, spelling, grammar, vocabulary. He won’t get there like YS (14) did. He’s been trying that way around for almost five years now. WritingHe’s constantly working on sequencing, motor planning, working memory, motor coordination, timing, pacing, and all the procedural learning strengthening activities he can juggle. All day long. Crossing the mid-line, agility ladder, strengthening his core and upper body, piano for finger strength, writing over top of my writing to get the motions into his muscles, metronome work with large muscles and singing and reading. Drilling letter pairs, faster, faster, faster. We’re seeing changes in a lot of areas. But not in writing. We’re using a lovely font that worked beautifully for our older son and me. BA has been at it for two relentless months. No change. None. He still writes bottom to top, his curves and connections are still highly problematic. He has to use too much of his attention creating the letters to focus on anything else. He can’t take notes this way. He can’t write a paper this way. He can’t write a letter this way. Me: Do you think the writing is working? BA: No. It’s not any easier. Me: (Showing him an impromptu drafting-style lettering.) What about this? BA: (Immediate relief in his voice.) That looks much easier. That’s how I would write. Look, see? (Writes me his alphabet.) That’s how I want to make letters. The other way doesn’t make sense. Me: We’re not going to do the other way again. We’re going to use letters that look like this. Upper case will be big and lower case will be small. And that. Is that.

Do You Think for Yourself?

Do You Think for Yourself?

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. Me: What time did you wake up this morning? The Young Statesman (13): 5:30 Me: People are going to be interested in knowing what it is that causes a thirteen-year-old to wake at 5:30 in the morning. Can you tell me about that? YS: If I get up that early I can go to the gym and I can practice the organ. Those are two things I want to do every day and we do that every day. It’s done and I don’t have to worry about it. When I wake up early I can get that done early. Me: You didn’t just wake yourself up, did you? BubbleYS: I woke The Baby Anarchist (8). Me: How did you do that? YS: I tuned on the light and woke him and gave him his clothes. While he brushed his teeth I made his bed. Then I went to my room, made my bed, tidied up, put away my laundry, brushed my teeth, and went downstairs. I let the dog out, I fed her, I filled up the water bottles for the gym, I got the breakfast cooler together, and we went to the gym. Me: Did your brother need help with his shoes? YS: Yeah. The shoe laces aren’t that good so I helped him. Me: Why do you help your brother? YS: One day I’m going to want his help. I’d might as well be nice to him. Me: Did I tell you to do these things? YS: No. You said you were going to the gym at 6 in the morning and if I got up early I could join you. Then you asked BA if he wanted to come so now all of us go. Me: You’re a pretty independent kid, aren’t you? YS: I don’t like to be told what to do. Me: If I started pestering you to do things, what would be your reaction? YS: I’d wonder if you’d been hit in the head. Me: If I were insisting that you do these things would you be as willing as you are? YS: Nope. Me: Why not? YS: Because when I’m being told to do things that puts me in a passive frame of mind. And it makes me not like you if you’re bossing me around. Me: Tell me about being passive. YS: If I try to take the initiative, I’m going to end up butting up against you. I’m living off of you and what you’re telling me to do. I stop thinking. Me: At that point you’re just being directed. YS: I stop thinking. I’m just in brainless mode. I’m like a dog. Me: How long can you stand to be in that mode? YS: Not very long. If you’re in that mode for very long, you rebel. Me: So you act rebelliously? YS: Yes. In response to not being allowed to think for yourself you make stupid decisions. You don’t even think before you act. Me: So your actions aren’t so much your own decisions as they are reactions against authority. I don’t think that’s just what adolescents do. Anyone who is being dominated and doesn’t think it’s legitimate is going to do that. YS: You’ve taught me to think. Not to obey. You don’t tell me what to do. You give advice. I can take it or not. Me: Would there be a problem if you didn’t take my advice? YS: No. Me: You’d just have a different experience. I notice that you take my advice more often than not. Why? YS: Because when I haven’t taken your advice I’ve gotten hurt. Remember when you told me not to run in flip flops and I didn’t listen and I scraped my face across the road? Me: That was so awful. YS: I was trying to take something back to a neighbor. It really hurt. I’ve never run in flip flops since. Do you remember when you told me not to shriek and cry about everything because you wouldn’t know when I was really hurt? And then when we were at the swamp and I broke my arm and I was screaming and crying and you didn’t come because I screamed and cried at everything. That was a learning experience. And when dad told me not to run the chisel towards my hand and I did it anyway and we ended up in the ER for five hours. Or when he told me not to shove sharp things and I was in the ER again. I’m learning. Slowly. And painfully. But if you had stopped me, I wouldn’t have learned to listen. Me: We would have stopped you from getting hurt if we could have. Do you think the injuries were worth it? YS: I do.

What Happens When Demand Increases?

What Happens When Demand Increases?

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. How will I explain the phenomenon of rising prices after a disaster to my seven-year-old son? I’ll say something like this. You know there was a big storm in the Northeast. We saw it on television. There was flooding, there was a big fire, trees were down, and now there’s no electricity in a lot of places. It’s pretty miserable. Supply And Demand Analysis Concept People want clean water, food, and gasoline. They want to be able to clear away the trees that fell and they want to be able to run their generators if they’re without power. Normally, they could get these things, but because of the storm not only do they need more, but it’s hard for these things to get in. The normal supply lines are cut. So they want more and there’s less than usual around. We’ve talked about scarcity before. It’s when there is a limited amount of the things we want. Right now, the things that they want are scarce. Demand has increased. We’ve also talked about what happens when demand increases. When demand increases, prices go up. Prices just tell us how much of this thing is available. It’s information. Like when there’s a bad drought, the price of tomatoes goes up because there are fewer tomatoes to sell. The opposite is also true. When there is a lot of something, the price goes down. If I have a tomato farm and I have twice as many tomatoes one really good year, the price of tomatoes will go down. You can tell how much of something there is by its price. This is the situation in the Northeast right now. Demand for gas, clean water, generators, and things like that has increased. What happens to prices when demand increases? Right. Prices go up. You’ve seen this happen in daddy’s ebay business. When he’s down to the last ten of an item, he hikes up the price. It’s still available if someone really wants it, but those last ten are really really valuable. When he gets more in stock, he lowers the price again. Remember how your brother asked you what you would do if you only had one cup of water each day? You said you’d drink that water. And if you only had two cups, you would use the second cup for keeping clean. And if you had three cups you would use the third cup for growing plants. And if you had four cups you might use the fourth cup for playing in the sprinkler or something. You understand when things are scarce, you use them differently. You economize. They are more valuable when there is less. Everyone understands that. Anyway, back to the storm. Let’s say daddy sold things that would be important in an emergency. He has a store that sells gas, water, ice, and flashlights. He knows that as a storm approaches the demand for these things will increase and that perhaps his supply line will be severed for many days. He won’t be able to get more for a while. He will have a limited supply–like when you only have three cups of water. When demand increases, he’s going to raise prices. People won’t be able to buy as much. They’ll have to think about how they use what they buy. This keeps things on the shelves longer and when someone desperately needs a thing, it is more likely to be there for them. That’s really important during an emergency. It can even save people’s lives. Now, some people would say that it’s mean of daddy to raise prices when demand increases. But that’s not true. He’s simply letting people know that it’s time to economize. They need to think hard about how they want to use things. He’s just passing along information. And there’s good reason for him to do it. He’ll make more money if he’s doing the right thing. It also makes it worth his while to go to the store and keep it open for the one guy who really, really needs something. When the prices go up, he’s not going to sell as much, but he still has to be there. If he keeps his prices low, he’ll sell out and close his store. So, what we know is that when demand increases, prices go up. When demand decreases, prices go down. Those are just laws. Like inertia. We just have to know that they’re laws and that they’re always in effect. We shouldn’t be surprised by them. Some people try to suspend law and make it so store owners can’t increase their prices as demand increases. That’s really bad. It doesn’t work and it leads to more shortages because people won’t economize on their use of the scarce goods and services. If they aren’t properly priced, the consumer doesn’t know how valuable it is. They might buy the last flashlight to entertain their children in the dark when a guy two blocks over needed that flashlight to find something really important–like maybe the gas shut off–in the night. When things cost more or when we have less of a thing we really think about how we use it. If the prices don’t give us that information, that causes more problems in an already bad situation.

The Philosophy of Liberty

The Philosophy of Liberty

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. Me: What can you tell me about the philosophy of liberty? BA (10): You own your life. Other people own their lives. Me: Does any other person have a higher claim on your life than you do? BA: No. Philosophy of Liberty Me: What do we call it when we say someone has a higher claim on your life than you have? BA: Slavery. Me: You exist in time, right? BA: Yeah. Past, present, and future. Me: What do we call it when someone steals your future? BA: Murder. Me: And when someone steals your property what are they stealing? BA: That’s called theft. They’re stealing the time you spent in the past to get that thing. Me: And when someone comes and enslaves you or uses force to get you to do what they want you to do? BA: They’re stealing your present. Me: Why not your past? BA: Because you weren’t enslaved in the past. Me: And why not the future? BA: Because it hasn’t been determined yet. Me: Property is pretty important. BA: It’s something you spent your past acquiring. It’s like bees. They spend their time gathering stuff and making honey and that honey is like time made real. That’s their property and they will protect it. Me: So you’re allowed to protect your justly acquired property. BA: Yes. You can ask other people help you protect your property, too. Me: When you’re protecting your property are you allowed to hurt people? BA: Yes. But you aren’t going to hurt someone over a penny. Me: We call that proportionality. Can you hurt innocent bystanders as you try to get your property back? BA: No. You can not hurt innocent people. They’re allowed to come after you if you hurt them even if you hurt them in pursuit of justice. Me: If you hurt them and they’re innocent then you have to make them whole? BA: Yes. Me: Give me an example. BA: If you’re running after the guy who stole your TV set and you knock me down and break my arm, you have to pay my medical expenses because you have hurt me. Me: But I didn’t mean to hurt you. I just wanted my TV back and you were in the way. BA: It doesn’t matter. You break it, you buy it. It doesn’t matter what you were doing. Me: So if they guy who stole my TV came through your house and I wrecked your house trying to get back my TV what would I have to do? BA: Make me whole.  

Santa?

Santa?

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. Me: Tell me about Santa. santaBA (10): People say he’s a fat guy who likes milk and cookies, defies physics and flies around on a sled with flying reindeer, goes around the world delivering presents to everyone in one day. But what he really is, is the guy who gives stuff in secret which I can believe a lot easier. Me: What do you mean? BA: Santa Claus is Saint Nicholas. Saint Nicholas gave in secret. Like Santa Claus does. Me: But Saint Nicholas is dead. How can he give children stuff? BA: People do what he did. They say it’s Santa Claus giving when they give in secret. Santa is the name they use for secret giving. They’re doing what Saint Nicholas did. Giving in secret. Me: Yeah that’s…. BA: But the Santa thing doesn’t make any sense. You can’t get around the world and deliver presents all in one night. People make stuff up to convince you it happens but it doesn’t make sense. He has a magical bag because the sled can’t hold all the presents for all the kids in the world. Flying reindeer? Goofball. People think he comes down your chimney. What if you don’t have a chimney? And what if you have a whole bunch of stuff in front of your fireplace. And if you have a chimney like ours, how is he going to get in? Me: What are your thoughts on this? BA: It’s like believing in superheroes or something from a movie. I just don’t believe in magic. I think things have a reason. There’s a reason behind everything. If you don’t know the reason something happened that doesn’t mean it’s magic. There’s never been magic. Everything that happens has a reason. You have to think. You have to figure out that reason. What it is that makes something happen. Me: You sound annoyed by it. BA: I’m annoyed that someone would make something up like that. Why? Tell the kid the truth. What about kids who believe that Santa is magic and ask for things like a house or food or to get better from something? Don’t make something up. There are reasons for things. Me: Do you remember that April Fool’s video I showed you when you were little? The one with the flying penguins. BA: No. Me: You were aware that penguins couldn’t fly. We had told you that. But when you saw the video you were so excited. You really wanted for penguins to be able to fly so you were so excited. And I had to immediately tell you it was an April Fool’s video. You were so sad. Even though you knew they couldn’t fly the video looked real and for a second you really were excited because you wanted to believe it and then you were crushed. It was awful. BA: Kids can be fooled. They’ll believe things they really want to believe. Sometimes I want to tell my friends that he’s not real. They just go on and on about it and it doesn’t make sense. Me: I think you need to leave it alone if someone believes in Santa Claus. BA: They just go on and on about it. It’s not true but they really want to believe it. There’s nothing you can do about kids who believe in Santa Claus anyway. They don’t want to know what’s true. You wonder what they’re going to believe in next. Pixies? You just have to go along with it. Me: Throughout your life you’re going to meet people who willfully believe things that are clearly untrue and you’re just going to have to hold your tongue and know that it’s really important to them to believe this thing. Santa is practice for that. BA: But even their parents will tell you, “Yeah, there’s no Santa but we still do Santa at our house.” There is no magic. There are reasons that things happen. You have to figure things out. He went on for quite some time. Completely flummoxed that–even in the face of a great deal of evidence against Jolly Old Saint Nick and in favor of his name being used when someone wanted to give in secret–children would so willingly disregard reason and instead believe what pleased them.

They Want Hate Between You

They Want Hate Between You

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. BA(10): I wish I knew why those terrorist did that. Me: Would it comfort you to know why? BA: It would help me if I understood why. HateMe: Well, they murdered those people so you would hate Muslims. Like Al (a friend who is Muslim). They want you to hate Al. BA: I would never hate Al. Why do they want me to hate him? Me: They want you to make Al feel hated and attacked. They want you to work for them and make Al feel attacked. Like you are his enemy. They want you to hate Al and attack him so he has to defend himself from you. BA: Why would they want that? Me: They want Al to feel persecuted by you and they can’t do that job. They have to make you do that. They want hate between you. They want Al to hate you and they want Al to join them. BA: I would never hate Al. Me: It doesn’t begin as hate. It begins as fear and distrust. When you fear and distrust your friends and neighbors you are doing the work the terrorists want you to do. You are working for them. BA: If I hate anyone I hate the terrorists. Me: That also serves them. Hate is like a little pile of burning matches. You can not put out that little burning pile of matches by adding your own burning match to it. You must quench hate and more hate does not quench hate. Do you see? BA: Yes. Me: When there is great hatred like there was last night in Paris we are being called to great love and compassion. We are called to love the people who have died and the mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, sons, daughters, and friends who are heartbroken with grief. Love quenches hate. Do you see? BA: They want me to hate and be afraid. Me: Yes. Do you remember those people who came to our church to frighten people? BA: It’s like that. It’s the same thing. Only they didn’t kill us they just tried to scare us. Me: Yes. It’s hate. They want you to hate. When you hate, you are on the side of those who hate.

How do You Defeat Hydra?

How do You Defeat Hydra?

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. Me: YS, do you know what a Hydra is? BA (10): It’s a monster. Every time you chop off one of its heads, two grow in its place. Me: How do you know this? Hydra 2BA: Minecraft. In the Twilight Forest there’s a Hydra. Me: Do you know why I’m asking about the Hydra? YS (15): Terrorism? It’s like we’re fighting Hydra. The more we fight, the more heads it makes. Me: So how do you defeat an enemy like that? YS: First you need to stop cutting off the heads. Me: But that doesn’t make it go away. How do you destroy a thing you can’t destroy with an attack? YS: Stop fueling it. Me: What is this Hydra’s fuel? YS: We’ve been giving this Hydra literal weapons, literal training, literal financing. Me: Why did we do this? YS: We thought we could control it so we grew it. Then it spun out of control. Now it’s attacking us. Me: Who are the teeth of the Hydra? YS: Terrorists who carry out the attacks. Me: And what can you tell me about them? YS: They’re mad. They’ve had something done to them. Me: They are called Injustice Collectors and they are easily radicalized. You’re describing something called radicalization. Sometimes what happens is citizens of a country will become radicalized and carry out acts of terror in their own country. People are afraid of immigrants and refugees when actually it’s just as likely to be radicalized citizens who carry out terrorism in their own countries. If someone is running away from terrorism in their own country are they going to become radicalized in their new home? YS: No. They want nothing to do with it. Refugees from ISIS are the anti-ISIS. They have experienced it. Me: What kind of effect will an influx of refugees fleeing ISIS violence have on a population? YS: Those people are not likely to be recruited. They’re going to tell people who could potentially be radicalized that they shouldn’t. They’ve lived it. Me: What else feeds the Hydra? YS: Hatred. Me: When you are hateful to a person they are more willing to be the teeth. How do we make them unwilling to be the teeth? YS: Those people around us that ISIS is targeting for recruitment, we need to show them kindness. Me: That’s what starves Hydra. YS: The state has murdered their people in our name, just like ISIS has murdered people in the name of all Muslims. We have to be kind and think logically. We have to not want to be afraid of these terrorists. Emotional responses don’t get people anywhere. Me: We kind of enjoy being afraid, don’t we? YS: Right. Like gun control. Emotional, irrational responses. There’s a mass shooting and people get scared and the start yelling for gun control. It’s like that. It doesn’t work. Gun control doesn’t stop violent people. It just makes it easier for violent people to be violent. It’s an emotional response. We need to think but emotional responses are a lot of fun for the majority of people.

Observations from Halloween

Observations from Halloween

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. (Editor’s note: This is not a direct conversation with either the Young Statesman or the Baby Anarchist, but the timeliness and insight within are the reason for publishing)

Questions Nobody Asks

halloweenWho will plan and build Halloween? What about the free-rider problem of the neighbor who takes his kids trick-or-treating instead of staying home to give out candy?
Who will make sure that the maximum trick-or-treating age is enforced? Do they have a license to distribute food? What makes you think anyone will do it if it’s entirely voluntary? Who is going to pay for all of this?

Safety in 2015

October 31st is the only day we think rightly about this being the safest time in the history of the world to raise children. They’re out there in the dark, wearing masks and brandishing weapons, walking the streets alone, taking candy from strangers.

Halloween = Economists’ Christmas

Halloween is like Christmas for economists. It is a wild festival of human action, subjective value, and free trade. And while I am not an economist nor do I play one on TV, my children sell me their Halloween candy. We are capitalists, Baby. We won’t tax you. We won’t confiscate your hard-earned candy causing you to give up after ninety minutes. No! None of that. We will pay you cash money for your haul. That’s right! Stay out later, walk farther, and trick or treat longer than other children because your effort will be rewarded with cash. Mommy doesn’t want that stuff in the house so she will pay to get her hands on it and get it outta here.
What’s it worth to you? How much do you value that? What do you really want to keep? What could you do with that money? You selling by the piece, pound, type, or lot?

The Internet Privacy Conversation

The Internet Privacy Conversation

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. Baby Anarchist (BA) (10): I need to use my device upstairs because it has directions to my Lego project. Me: Can you print the directions? BA: It’s hundreds of pages long. Me: Do you and your dad have an agreement about using your device upstairs? BA: Yes. Me: Just for the instructions? BA: Yes. Large Man Looking At Co-Worker With A Magnifying GlassMe: YS, do you know why no one in the house uses devices in their own private spaces? Young Statesman (YS): It gives you the impression that there’s privacy on the Internet. Me: Right. Is there privacy on the Internet? YS: None. Me: Do you know about Ashley Madison? YS: No. Me: People married and agreed to forsake all others and they made this agreement in front of their families and friends and the understanding was that this was their agreement. They used the Ashley Madison service to violate the terms of their agreement. They believed that to be in secret. That they had privacy on the Internet. They were publicly exposed as users of Ashley Madison. YS: Wow. Me: Some of them lost their families, their friends, their jobs, and some were so distraught that they killed themselves. All because they rejected reality. Reality is that there is no privacy on the Internet. YS: They thought because they didn’t like reality it wouldn’t hurt them. Me: Right. They weren’t oriented towards reality. They thought their ignoring reality would somehow defend them. YS: There’s no privacy on the Internet. Me: None. And if we allowed you to think there was privacy associated with Internet use by allowing the use of devices in private spaces we’d be allowing you think something that wasn’t true. Me: Do you remember the story about the teenagers who were sexting and arrested for it? YS(14): No. Me: One of them sexted the other and was charged as an adult for distributing child pornography. That’s a crime that can include being registered as a sex offender as well as jail time. YS: How can they be tried as adults? They’re minors. Me: For some crimes minors are tried as adults. YS: That doesn’t make sense. They were pictures of themselves. Me: It’s wrong but that doesn’t matter. If a person goes to court on child pornography charges even if it’s ridiculous and dismissed… YS: That never goes away. Me: Right. Even if they were wronged and it’s insane… YS: It’s going to stick. Me: Yes. So if you receive something like that you can be charged with possession of child pornography. As an adult. Even if you didn’t want it. You can be set up. YS: That’s unbelievable. Me: I know. And this is awkward, but it’s too important for us not to have this conversation. YS: Just because you don’t want to know doesn’t mean it won’t hurt you. Me: Right. And if you find yourself in a situation where you’re holding something that can get you jail time, you have to tell us immediately. We trust you understand how dire it would be to face jail and that you would not willingly do anything that would result in jail time. YS: Right. Me: So if you find yourself in a dangerous situation you must tell us immediately. We know you wouldn’t put yourself there on purpose so there’s no blame. Just help. But you have to be quick.

Respectability Politics and Discrimination

Respectability Politics and Discrimination

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. Me: Tell me about Respectability Politics. Young Statesman (14): It’s basically making excuses for cultural prejudices. “If they were more respectable then this bad thing wouldn’t be happening.” discriminationMe: Who can Respectability Politics be used against? YS: Minorities. Me: Just race? YS: No. The poor. Muslims. Anyone different from you. Me: The assumption in Respectability Politics is that the group that is being discriminated against…. YS: …is doing it to themselves. It’s never the discriminating group’s problem. They bring the discrimination upon themselves. If they were more respectable then this wouldn’t be happening. If they changed what they did then they wouldn’t be discriminated against. Me: Have you ever heard the expression “victim blaming”? YS: No, I haven’t. Me: What does it sound like to you? YS: Something has been done to someone by someone else and you’re blaming the person it was done to. “You wouldn’t have been shot if you were more respectable.” “You wouldn’t be bullied if you were a nicer kid.” You’re saying, “it’s your fault.” Me: Was it a lack of respectability on the part of blacks in America that caused racism? YS: No. Whites thought they were better. Me: Do you think they sincerely thought themselves better? YS: Yes. Me: I don’t agree with you. YS: Why? Me: I think it was a lie they told themselves. YS: So they could feel innocent of wrongdoing? Me: Yes. You know Irish people came over as chattel slaves, too. A lot of white people came to America as slaves. YS: I didn’t know that. I thought that was just indentured servitude. Me: White slavery was not as common as black slavery but it certainly wasn’t uncommon. So, was it a lack of respectability that caused the racism? YS: No. I think it was slavery. Me: You understand that slavery included the molestation of children, rape, torture, murder, the destruction of families. The children of slave women were born into slavery. Even the children of the slave owners born to slave women were born into slavery. YS: That’s sick stuff. Me: It is. It’s hard to do sick stuff and still feel good about yourself. YS: They had to come up with a story. They had to put the victim in a bad light. They had to make it their fault because otherwise they would feel bad. They made up a story. They gave themselves reasons to justify their behavior. Me: But we don’t do that any more, right? We don’t justify bad behavior with stories, do we? YS: [Laughs.] We justify all kinds of things. Killing people. Wars. Theft. Me: We do like to tell ourselves stories don’t we? YS: We call them reasons.