Alternatives to Public Education are Growing
At the community newspaper, Bluffton Today, Molly Clancy reported on the rising interest in private schooling.
Clancy notes that families are opting for alternative education programs for various reasons: “To honor religious beliefs, prevent bullying, address learning disabilities or behavioral problems, explore more options in academics and athletics.”
Private schools have traditionally been the top choice for families who remove their children from the public education system. However, charter schools, online schools, and homeschooling have opened up new opportunities for students in the 21st century.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), the number of homeschoolers in the U.S. grew from 850,000 in 1999 to 1.7 million in 2016. People homeschool for various reasons. Religion tends to be one of the leading factors, however, secular forms of homeschooling have been growing in popularity. Some children feel held back by the one-size-fits-all educational model of public schools, and cannot reach their full potential in such a constrained environment. In some cases, the school environment poses an actual danger to a child’s safety. This rings especially true for children in urban schools where violence during the school day is not uncommon.
Thanks to our digital era, we’re seeing a rise in the alternative of virtual schooling. In the article, Clancy points to Georgia Virtual School which features courses that can supplement or even replace public, private, and home education for students with special needs. While virtual education acts as a supplement rather than a replacement more often, it demonstrates the multifaceted nature of education in our digital era.
Of educational alternatives, charter schools have gained the most notoriety in recent years. According to the NCES, these publicly funded but privately managed institutions have witnessed a boom in enrollment over the last two decades. As of 2016, 3 million students were enrolled in charter schools, representing 6 percent of the total public school population. Charter schools tend to be independently governed, which usually translates into fewer layers of administration between students, parents, and staff. The lack of bureaucracy in charter schools is a major selling point to parents who prefer a more streamlined educational experience for their children.
What we see described in the aforementioned article about Georgia is part of a growing national trend of parents questioning the public schooling their children are receiving. Hopefully, such developments can actually snowball into a movement towards non-governmental forms of education, which have been the norm in America throughout most of its history.
The key to education reform is not so much about whether one alternative model is the best. The overarching theme is really about market choice in education. With genuine market variants of education available, schoolchildren can finally acquire educational services in line with their needs. Just because politicians claim government-run schools are “for the children” does not make it so. The history of public education has shown that it benefits politically-connected teacher organizations and administrators at the expense of pupils.
A new educational path for America’s youth is long overdue.
Clancy notes that families are opting for alternative education programs for various reasons: “To honor religious beliefs, prevent bullying, address learning disabilities or behavioral problems, explore more options in academics and athletics.”
Private schools have traditionally been the top choice for families who remove their children from the public education system. However, charter schools, online schools, and homeschooling have opened up new opportunities for students in the 21st century.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), the number of homeschoolers in the U.S. grew from 850,000 in 1999 to 1.7 million in 2016. People homeschool for various reasons. Religion tends to be one of the leading factors, however, secular forms of homeschooling have been growing in popularity. Some children feel held back by the one-size-fits-all educational model of public schools, and cannot reach their full potential in such a constrained environment. In some cases, the school environment poses an actual danger to a child’s safety. This rings especially true for children in urban schools where violence during the school day is not uncommon.
Thanks to our digital era, we’re seeing a rise in the alternative of virtual schooling. In the article, Clancy points to Georgia Virtual School which features courses that can supplement or even replace public, private, and home education for students with special needs. While virtual education acts as a supplement rather than a replacement more often, it demonstrates the multifaceted nature of education in our digital era.
Of educational alternatives, charter schools have gained the most notoriety in recent years. According to the NCES, these publicly funded but privately managed institutions have witnessed a boom in enrollment over the last two decades. As of 2016, 3 million students were enrolled in charter schools, representing 6 percent of the total public school population. Charter schools tend to be independently governed, which usually translates into fewer layers of administration between students, parents, and staff. The lack of bureaucracy in charter schools is a major selling point to parents who prefer a more streamlined educational experience for their children.
What we see described in the aforementioned article about Georgia is part of a growing national trend of parents questioning the public schooling their children are receiving. Hopefully, such developments can actually snowball into a movement towards non-governmental forms of education, which have been the norm in America throughout most of its history.
The key to education reform is not so much about whether one alternative model is the best. The overarching theme is really about market choice in education. With genuine market variants of education available, schoolchildren can finally acquire educational services in line with their needs. Just because politicians claim government-run schools are “for the children” does not make it so. The history of public education has shown that it benefits politically-connected teacher organizations and administrators at the expense of pupils.
A new educational path for America’s youth is long overdue.
Republican Senator Marco Rubio, the son of Cubans who escaped Cuban totalitarianism, quickly 
Curiously, college enrollment has fallen for the eighth consecutive year. The total university headcount, which includes both undergraduate and graduate students, dropped by 1.3 percent from the fall of 2018 to the fall of 2019, according to the 
According to a study that was 
One of the defenders of the initiative, State Senator Brian Kelsey, 
Heather Mac Donald, a contributor at the public policy magazine City Journal, 
This is most apparent when dealing with healthcare. Even supposed “pro-market” Republicans are falling for interventionist traps such as price controls. 
Although red flag laws are generally associated with 
According to the National Bureau of Education Research (NBER), tuition prices skyrocketed by 102 percent from 1987 to 2010. By 2019, 
Republican Assemblyman Michael Reilly has become so fed up with New York City’s high taxes and reckless spending that he is hoping that upstate New York annexes Staten Island. Fellow Assemblyman David DiPietro has channeled Reilly’s frustration into a bold plan called Divide New York. This plan would divide the state into three regions: New York City, Montauk, and New Amsterdam.
Montauk would be comprised of Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, and Rockland counties and New Amsterdam would be made up of all of upstate New York. Reilly would take the plan even further by getting Staten Island out of New York City and have it join with upstate New York.
“In my personal view, I’m leaning toward going up to New Amsterdam,” he told the Post. “I don’t think we would align with the Montauk region.” In a
NATO’s formation in 
The recently concluded impeachment saga had a silver lining to it, regardless of where one stood on the issue. Politicians like Senator Rand Paul are leading the charge in rethinking America’s foreign aid policy, which played a role in the impeachment debate.
In December, Paul