Here's the Liberator Online issue you are looking for. Please note that, since this is a past issue,
some of the links may not work. Thank you for your interest in the Liberator Online. Enjoy!

 
Volume 14, No. 13                                                                                    Aug 20, 2009     
 
The Liberator Online
for everyone who loves liberty
published by the Advocates for Self-Government
 
"The Advocates leads the way in thinking, methods, and materials for communicating libertarianism to a world that most definitely needs it. Every libertarian activist has benefited from, and owes a debt of gratitude to, the Advocates."
 
David Bergland, author of Libertarianism In One Lesson,
1984 Libertarian Party presidential candidate

 
 
 
LIBERATOR
 
 ONLINE
SPECIAL OFFER!
 

 
 Secrets cover
 
Buy
 
MICHAEL CLOUD'S
great book
Secrets of
Libertarian Persuasion

now and get a wonderful CD absolutely FREE!
Find out more
 

 
_____________________

 
 








































 
Are You
an Activist
for Liberty?

We have the best
tools available
to help with
your outreach!

Find out about
our "Event in a Kit"
which will make
your booth
the most popular one
at any event!

Help people
discover where they fit
on the political map
while also
introducing them to
libertarianism!
Don't leave home
without an
ample supply of Quizzes!


___________________
































___________________

Buy Ron Paul's

incendiary
best-selling book
from Amazon
through this link

Ron Paul's Revolution
...and help
the Advocates
at the same time!

EVEN BETTER:
Get a
FREE copy
 when you support the Advocates!

________________











































 
 Help build a dynamic
movement for liberty!

liberty-bell
Learn more about the great things the Advocates is accomplishing -- and how YOU can make it happen!

________________


























































 
Books, DVDs, CDs, Quiz cards, OPH kits, T-shirts...
books
Find  great libertarian products
by shopping at
The Advocates
Liberty Store!


________________

























































 
-- advertisement --
 
 

Fabulous ads
against
nationalized
health care!


 Heartland logo
Looking for
free-market solutions
to today's most important social and economic
problems?
The Heartland Institute has the information
and arguments you need on education, taxation, health care, privatization of public services, market-based approaches to environmental protection,
and much more.
 
Milton Friedman called the Heartland Institute "a highly effective libertarian
institute."
 
See why!
Visit
HEARTLAND INSTITUTE
today!

_________________






















































 
          LIOL 
 
Best short introduction
to libertarianism!
A must for every
libertarian library --
and makes a GREAT GIFT
for friends
and family members
who want to learn more!

 


__________________









































































 
  Not only is
Michael Cloud
an expert
on persuasion --
he wrote the book
on it!

 
 

















































































 
Dr. Mary Ruwart
shows how libertarian ideas can solve the world's most pressing problems -- including poverty, pollution and war.

Healing Our World

"Great message!"
-- bestselling author Wayne Dyer.

Find out more and order your copy today!

__________________


































































 
Are YOU on

Facebook log
 

 
So are we!
 

 
See how you can use our acclaimed World's Smallest Political Quiz Facebook app to spread the
ideas of liberty throughout the Facebook community!

____________________
 
WELCOME to the Liberator Online!

In This Issue


PRESIDENT'S CORNER
* How one man found 100 new libertarian-leaning folks -- in one day!

GOOD NEWS, BAD NEWS, UNBELIEVABLE NEWS
* Cash for Clunkers: Another Giant Gov't Flop
* Poll: Support for ObamaCare Plummeting
* Tens of Thousands of U.K. Patients Forced to Live in Agony
* Obama's Drug Czar Spouts Flat-Earth Science
* Oh, the Injustice!
 
QUICK SHOTS:
The taxman cometh.... Nat Hentoff is finally scared.... Grandma and ObamaCare....

PERSUASION POWER POINT #273

*
Smearing and Name-Calling Turn Off the People     You're Trying to Persuade
   by Michael Cloud
 
ASK DR. RUWART
* Are smokers infringing on your rights?
 
ONE-MINUTE LIBERTY TIP
* The "Public Option" is Neither Public Nor Optional
   by Sharon Harris
 
WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE ADVOCATES
* Advocates President at Illinois LP Convention
* 2009 Annual Freedom Cruise
 
Sharon HarrisPresident's
Corner




by

Sharon Harris


How one man found 100 new libertarian-leaning folks -- in one day!


Jeremy SasserCollins of Twin Falls, Idaho celebrated the Fourth of July in a great way. He used OPH (Operation Politically Homeless) to discover about 100 new libertarian-leaning folks in his community!
 
It was Jeremy's first experience with OPH, the Advocates' acclaimed "event in a kit" that makes libertarian outreach effective, easy and... fun.
 
Most OPH teams operate with more than one person, but Jeremy ran his OPH by himself. That makes his success all the more remarkable.
 
Jeremy sent us a report on his OPH experience. Here are some excerpts:
 
 
Dear Advocates,
 
I had the pleasure of launching Operation Politically Homeless at our local July 4th Tea Party. The experience was fantastic and a great learning tool for others, but I think I learned the most!
 
I collected about 100 names of OPH - IDpeople I did not know [and contact information for them]. Many of them were surprised to score in the Libertarian section. I encountered no one who didn't know what libertarians were.
 
Next time I do an OPH event, I will have with me copies of the Advocates' Discover Liberty outreach tabloid. I will send the participants who scored below 100/100 -- but within the Libertarian section -- away with the Discover Liberty tabloid as "homework," telling them, "Now, because you have the similar goal of smaller government, study up on how libertarianism can help you achieve your goals without more government."
 
Now I'm planning to start a series of Freedom Films showings, at which I'll show popular documentaries and invite the new names on my list.
 
Thank you, Advocates, for your outreach tools, for these techniques and for your help in shipping these materials out to me so quickly.

Thank you, Jeremy!
 
You, too, can use OPH to discover dozens or even hundreds of libertarian-leaning folks in your community.
 
Find out more about OPH here.

* * * * * * * *

Welcome to 611 new Liberator Online subscribers this issue!

The purpose of the Liberator Online is to build a stronger movement for liberty. We do this by providing information about the libertarian movement, news analysis from a libertarian perspective, and, most importantly, information and resources on how to best communicate the ideas of liberty. Thank you for being a part of this!
 
Learn more about the Advocates and our work for liberty.
 
Learn more about libertarianism -- the philosophy of liberty.
 
-- Sharon Harris, President
Email: sharon@TheAdvocates.org

Good News,
Bad News,
Unbelievable News

 
by James W. Harris

Cash for Clunkers: Another Giant Gov't Flop 

Syndicated columnist Steve Chapman may have summed up the absurd "Cash for Clunkers" program better than anyone:
 
cash for clunkers 3"Cash for Clunkers has been a thrilling moment for advocates of expanded government, who say it proves what we can accomplish when our leaders put their minds to it. They are absolutely right. The program proves the federal government is unsurpassed at two things: dispersing money and destroying things.
 
"Of course, it already proved that in Iraq. But for sheer rapidity of confirmation, this program is hard to beat."
 
Supporters of Cash for Clunkers defend it on two grounds. First, that new cars will be easier on the environment. Second, that sale of new cars will boost the auto industry (which lobbied Washington heavily in support of the program) and the economy in general.
 
By those standards (and others) the program is a giant, expensive, even dangerous flop.
 
Consider:
 
* Many of the new cars being purchased get poor mileage. Auto sakes expert Edmunds.com points out that the Ford Escape crossover SUV is the most popular vehicle being purchased in these programs, and two full-size trucks that get about 14 miles per gallon are in the top ten.

* Any fuel savings may be lost because the program encourages more driving. Says economist Jeffrey A. Miron: "[C]ash for clunkers might cause more driving, since new cars are more fun to drive, and more fuel-efficient cars are less costly to operate."
 
* Energy is wasted and total fossil fuel use might actually be increased. Economist Jeffrey A. Miron notes: "It takes energy to scrap old vehicles and produce new ones, so the net effect of the program might even increase the use of fossil fuel."
 
* The program actually increases toxic emissions. According to Americans for Tax Reform: "[S]everal studies point to the fact that replacing old cars with new ones in fact increases carbon emissions, as the manufacturing stage is responsible for a large percentage of all toxics released over the life-cycle of a car."
 
* Most buyers would have traded their cars in soon anyway -- without the taxpayer-funded bonus. The New York Times notes that "Economists say that most buyers simply moved up the timing of their purchase..."

And Jeremy Anwyl, CEO of Edmunds.com, said in the Wall Street Journal: "Edmunds.com noted rcash for clunkers 2ecently that over 100,000 buyers put their purchases on hold waiting for the program to launch. Once consumers could start cashing in on July 24, showrooms were flooded and government servers were overwhelmed as the backlog of buyers finalized their purchases. Secondly, on July 27, Edmunds.com published an analysis showing that in any given month 60,000 to 70,000 'clunker-like' deals happen with no government program in place. The 200,000-plus deals the government was originally prepared to fund through the program's Nov. 1 end date were about the 'natural' clunker trade-in rate."
 
* Valuable resources are being destroyed. The program mandates that traded "clunkers" must be destroyed. But many of these are perfectly serviceable cars, that could provide affordable and badly-needed transportation for low-income persons, first-time car buyers, students, families seeking a reliable second car, and the like. These useful resources are now being destroyed, and used car buying in the future will be harder for the people who can least afford it.
 
* Alleged gasoline savings are greatly exaggerated, because many of the "clunkers" were seldom used anyway. The New York Times notes that experts suspect the trade-ins are often "spare cars in multicar households, and driven very few miles every year..." and "Economists say ... that the projected gasoline savings are exaggerated because many of the trade-ins were seldom used."
 
* The economy as a whole is harmed. Wealth is being diverted or destroyed, not created. The money is forcibly taken by government to subsidize some consumers and a few favored industries. Consumers thus cannot use that same money to spend where they wish, to meet their primary needs and desires. Businesses where that money might otherwise have been spent suffer. The result is a net loss for society. 
 
* It's yet another dangerous precedent. What industry will taxpayers be forced to subsidize next? Where does this stop? And where in the Constitution is the federal government given the power to engage in these kinds of hijinks?
 
Cash for Clunkers -- yet another disaster, brought to you by the federal government.
 
Poll: Support for ObamaCare Plummeting
 
The hard work by freedom movement activists to halt the rush to nationalized health care is paying off.
 
According to a Rasmussen Reports national survey released on August 11, public support for the Democratic health care reform plan is falling like a rock.
 
Only 42% of U.S. voters favor the plan -- down five points from just two weeks earlier.
 
53% oppose it -- up nine points since late June.
 
More significantly, 44% of voters strongly health care - doctoroppose the health care reform plan, versus only 26% who strongly favor it.
 
According to Rasmussen, most voters (51%) say health care quality will get worse, and costs will go up, if the Congressional health care plan is passed.
 
However, the government takeover plan is far from dead. 51% of all voters still say it is at least somewhat likely that the health care proposal will become law this year.
 
The message for freedom movement activists? Keep up the good work! Spread the word. People are listening. 
 
Tens of Thousands of U.K. Patients Forced to Live in Agony
 
British flag"Patients forced to live in agony after NHS refuses to pay for painkilling injections."

That horrifying headline appeared in the U.K. Telegraph newspaper on August 2, 2009.

And the accompanying story is as shocking as the headline promises.
 
Here's an excerpt:
 
"The Government's drug rationing watchdog says 'therapeutic' injections of steroids, such as cortisone, which are used to reduce inflammation, should no longer be offered to patients suffering from persistent lower back pain when the cause is not known.
 
"Instead the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is ordering doctors to offer patients remedies like acupuncture and osteopathy.
 
"Specialists fear tens of thousands of people, mainly the elderly and frail, will be left to suffer excruciating levels of pain or pay as much as £500 each for private treatment.
 
"The NHS currently issues more than 60,000 treatments of steroid injections every year. NICE said in its guidance it wants to cut this to just 3,000 treatments a year, a move which would save the NHS £33 million.
 
"But the British Pain Society, which represents specialists in the field, has written to NICE calling for the guidelines to be withdrawn after its members warned that they would lead to many patients having to undergo unnecessary and high-risk spinal surgery."

Doug Bandow of the Cato Institute notes: "The Obama administration seems unable to understand why Americans fear a federal takeover of the health system. Maybe this will give them a little more insight."

Obama's Drug Czar Spouts Flat-Earth Science
 
The Drug Czar of (former pot smoker) marijuana leafPresident Obama is sounding an awful lot like the Drug Czars of (alleged former pot smoker) George Bush and (former pot smoker) Bill Clinton.

In late July, explaining why he supports continuing America's savage war on peaceful marijuana smokers, Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske made this stunning declaration:
 
"Marijuana ... has no medicinal benefit."
 
Oh, really?
 
Tell that to the dozens of medical organizations that have publicly recognized marijuana's medical value, including the American College of Physicians, American Nurses Association, American Public Health Association, American Academy of HIV Medicine, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Lymphoma Foundation of America, American Academy of HIV Medicine, and many more.
 
Angel RaichOr tell it to the untold thousands of patients -- many suffering from grave illnesses -- who, following their doctors' advice, are using marijuana for medical purposes in the 13 states that have legalized the medical use of marijuana. (Or who are doing so illegally in the 37 other states.)
 
Or perhaps best of all, tell it to the esteemed National Academy of Science's Institute of Medicine -- the "gold standard" of U.S. medical opinion, whose membership includes some of the world's leading scientific and medical minds. In a 1999 study -- commissioned by (drum roll please) the U.S. Drug Czar's office itself -- the IOM declared that marijuana had medical uses and could be safely used: "Nausea, appetite loss, pain, and anxiety are all afflictions of wasting, and all can be mitigated by marijuana."
 
The so-idiotic-it's-hilarious movie Reefer Madness was made in 1936. Why, in 2009, are we still living in it?
 
Oh, The Injustice!
 
Libertarian journalist Sheldon Richman examines Sheldon Richmanthe outrage of insurance companies not covering preexisting conditions:
 
"The house of a friend caught on fire. While his home was aflame he called an insurance company to buy fire insurance. Honest fellow that he is, he told the company rep that his house was on fire as they spoke.
 
"The company refused to issue the policy.
 
"When will we finally get homeowner's insurance reform so that companies will stop this cruel practice of refusing to cover preexisting conditions?
 
"After that we should move against the life insurance companies' vicious discrimination against dead people."
 

 ---------------------------------------------

Quick Shots...

Jimmy FallonTHE TAX MAN COMETH: "Hey, at a concert in Washington, D.C., Paul McCartney dedicated the song 'Michelle' to Michelle Obama. And then, I thought this was sweet, he dedicated the song 'Taxman' to Barack." -- Jimmy Fallon, "Late Night with Jimmy Fallon," Aug. 3, 2009.
 
FINALLY HE'S SCARED: "I was not intimidated during J. Edgar Hoover's FBI hunt for reporters like me who criticized him. I railed against the Bush-Cheney war on the Bill of Rights without blinking. But now I am finally scared of a Nat HentoffWhite House administration. President Obama's desired health care reform intends that a federal board (similar to the British model) -- as in the Center for Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation in a current Democratic bill -- decides whether your quality of life, regardless of your political party, merits government-controlled funds to keep you alive." -- legendary liberal journalist Nat Hentoff.
 
GRANDMA AND OBAMACARE: "President Obama Conan O'Briensays he will not support a health-care plan where the government gets to decide whether to, quote, 'pull the plug on Grandma.' Apparently, Obama's plan calls for the much quicker pillow option." -- Conan O'Brien, "Late Night with Conan O'Brien," August 11, 2009.

* * * * * * * *
"Good News, Bad News, Unbelievable News" is written by Liberator Online editor James W. Harris. His articles have appeard in numerous magazines and newspapers, and he has been a Finalist for the Mencken Awards, given by the Free Press Association for "Outstanding Journalism in Support of Liberty."
Michael-CloudPERSUASION
POWER
POINT # 273

 
Smearing and Name-Calling Turn Off the People You're Trying to Persuade

by Michael Cloud

"This is straight out of Nazi Germany," says one pundit.
 
"...a tactic pioneered by Stalin," says another.
 
"...just like the Ku Klux Klan," posts a blogger.
 
"This moves America closer and closer angryto socialism," writes a columnist.
 
"Right out of the playbook of Adolph Hitler," notes a political commentator.
 
"A communist idea," writes another.
 
"...just like the Holocaust," says another.
 
"Pure fascism!" says another.
 
Those kinds of extreme, over-the-top, emotionally-charged terms do NOT drive people away from the idea being criticized. They do NOT bolster the case against the thing opposed.
 
They drive people away from the critic. They reduce the credibility of the critic. They undermine the case of the critic.
 
The name-callers and smear-artists often try to make an intellectual case for their strategy. They plumb the etymology of the word: its origin and historical development, its uses and meanings. They trace the word's use by a group or person that most people hate or fear: Nazis, Communists, the Ku Klux Klan, Hitler, or Stalin. Then, they insist that their word use is correct -- and that they are sincere and honest proponents of their viewpoint.
 
I'm not buying it. Nor do most people. Neither should you.
 
If you're warning people against putting cyanide in soft drinks, you don't need to tell them the story of the Jonestown suicide. You simply tell them what cyanide is -- and what it does.
 
If you're teaching people how to be more effective gardeners, and they're doing something that doesn't work, you don't have to call it "Lysenko communist horticulture" -- and demand they stop it. Just show them what works and why. The garden will prove your case.
 
listening - notIf you're arguing against "single-payer medical care" (government as the sole funder of medical care) or "public option medical insurance" (tax-funded, government-run option medical insurance), you don't have to call the proposal "socialism" or "socialized medicine." Simply sketch out the features, functions, costs, and consequences of the proposal. Compare it to the status quo. Is it better or worse? Then propose the free-market solutions in my article "6 Simple Ways to Dramatically Cut Medical Costs -- at Zero Expense to Taxpayers."

Are my proposals better or worse than "single-payer" and "public option"? Better or worse than the status quo?
 
Describing a proposal or idea you oppose with inflammatory language, emotionally-charged terms, and extreme words turns off and drives away the very people you want and need to persuade.
 
Smearing and name-calling erodes and erases your intellectual credibility. So, too, with the legitimacy of your position.
 
Do what Ludwig von Mises, Henry Hazlitt, and Harry Browne did. Unpack the Big Government proposal. Break it down into its key parts. Analyze the nature, functions, costs, and consequences of each part. Look up what free market writers and economists have written about each part. Your research may well reveal a far stronger case than you expected. Because the facts are friendly to freedom.
 
Smearing and name-calling usually backfire. Don't traffic in them.
 
Learn how to make strong cases AGAINST Big Government proposals, AGAINST their nature and consequences.
 
A little reason goes a long way.

* * * * * * * *
Michael Cloud is author of the acclaimed book Secrets of Libertarian Persuasion, available exclusively from the Advocates.
 
In 2000, Michael was honored with the Thomas Paine Award as the Most Persuasive Libertarian Communicator in America.

 
Mary-RuwartAsk
Dr.
Ruwart

 
Dr. Mary Ruwart is a leading expert in libertarian communication. In this column she offers short answers to real questions about libertarianism. To submit questions to Dr. Ruwart, see end of column.
  
Are smokers infringing on your rights?

QUESTION: I disagree with your recent column on smoking. Why is it up to the non-smoker to choose a smoke-free work environment or restaurant?smoking Isn't this a case where a person's right to swing their arms (i.e., smoking) ends with the next person's nose (potential health risks and fouling the clothing of non-smokers)? Isn't it the smokers who are infringing on my right to be free of their smoke?
 
MY SHORT ANSWER: I, too, am a non-smoker who appreciates a smoke-free environment, so I know exactly where you are coming from.
 
Libertarians don't support government-mandated smoking bans in restaurants and bars, because these restaurants and bars are the property of the owners, not the patrons or the government. Only the owners of these establishments have the right to determine whether smoking will be permitted.
 
Similarly, libertarians wouldn't outlaw smoking in residences so that non-smoking visitors wouldn't have to breathe the smoke of their hosts. In both cases, the owners decide what type of environment that they will invest in; patrons and visitors are free to decide if they wish to expose themselves to that environment.
 
Of course, "public" (government-owned) property, like courthouses and municipal buildings, poses special problems, because the "owners" (supposedly the entire citizenry, which include smokers and non-smokers), are unlikely to agree on whether or not to ban smoking there. So settling such disagreements is almost impossible. Such dilemmas support the libertarian notion that all property (or at the very least, as much as possible) should be private, and such decisions left to the owners. Clearly-defined property rights solve many, many problems!
 
LEARN MORE: Here is an excellent longer article on this topic: "Coping With Smoking," by libertarian philosopher Tibor R. Machan, The Freeman magazine.
 
* * * * * * * *
Got questions? Dr. Ruwart has answers! If you'd like answers to YOUR "tough questions" on libertarian issues, email Dr. Ruwart at: ruwart@theAdvocates.org
 
Due to volume, Dr. Ruwart can't personally acknowledge all emails. But we'll run the best questions and answers in upcoming issues.
 
Dr. Ruwart's previous Liberator Online answers are archived in searchable form.
 
Dr. Ruwart's outstanding books Healing Our World and Short Answers to the Tough Questions are available from the Advocates.

 
 Liberty Minute clock



One-Minute
Liberty Tip


The "Public Option" is Neither Public Nor Optional

by Sharon Harris

health care - surgeryProponents of a government health insurance plan have won a major rhetorical victory by having it commonly referred to as the "public option."
 
No defender of freedom should ever use that term. It is sheer propaganda, and highly misleading.
 
When you hear it used, consider politely responding that it is actually "the so-called public option."
 
Point out that this term is deceptive. Just as "public schools" are really "government schools, funded by taxpayers," the "public option" is really a "government health care plan, to be paid for by your tax dollars." It's actually the "government option."
 
Further, should it become law, it will likely quickly become not just an "option" but a mandatory plan. Health insurance companies must make a profit or go out of business. The government, of course, does not. It can offer insurance policies at below-market prices and operate at a loss for decades (like the Post Office, Amtrak, and endless other examples). Government can also burden and harass private sector insurance companies with ever-more-expensive mandates and requirements that will drive them out of business.
 
Soon enough, the "public option" may well become the only choice for the great majority of Americans, just as high taxes and regulations have made today's disastrous public -- excuse me, government -- schools the only practical choice for many Americans today, even those who would greatly prefer private alternatives.
 
The so-called "public option" is also not "optional" in the sense that taxpayers will have to fund it, regardless of whether or not they want to, and even if they find some aspects of it offensive to their moral views.
 
So don't let Big Government advocates get away with language like "public option."
 
Of course, virtually everyone realizes our current system is badly in need of bold change to help consumers. So let your listeners know that libertarians see this, sympathize with those suffering under our current system, and support strong reforms to dramatically increase consumer choice, lower health care costs, and help the needy. Be ready to offer alternatives to the radical takeover of our health care system being promoted today.
 
Here are some excellent resources to learn about common-sense market reforms that would improve, not destroy, our health care system:
 
* The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare: Eight things we can do to improve health care without adding to the deficit, by John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market Inc.

* Six Simple Ways to Dramatically Cut Medical Costs -- at Zero Expense to Taxpayers, by Liberator Online columnist Michael Cloud.
 
* The Top Ten Myths of American Health Care: A Citizen's Guide is by health care expert Sally C. Pipes. This is the FREE online short book I discussed in my President's Corner last issue. Click on the link at that page that says "Read PDF Study."
 
* * * * * *
Sharon Harris is president of the Advocates for Self-Government. See more One Minute Liberty tips.

 
What's Happening
with the Advocates

 
* ADVOCATES PRESIDENT AT ILLINOIS LP CONVENTION: Sharon Harris will deliver the keynote address at the Libertarian Party of Illinois annual convention, October 23-25 in Collinsville, near St. Louis. Other speakers soon to be announced. For more information, contact the Libertarian Party of Illinois.
 
* 2009 ANNUAL FREEDOM CRUISE: Advocates Board Member and longtime libertarian leader Dr. Ken Bisson invites you to join him for the 2009 Freedom Cruise September 19 - 26, 2009. Spend a wonderful week on a luxury cruiser! The itinerary: Boston, Massachusetts; Bar Harbor, Maine; Halifax,Canada; Sydney, Canada; Charlottetown, Prince Edward; Quebec City, Quebec; Montreal, Quebec. Non-libertarians welcome! Great food and fine company. (This isn't an Advocates event, but as noted, Ken is on our Board of Directors, and libertarians who have been on past cruises rave about them.) For photos and more details -- or to sign up for free, no-commitment email updates about this and the upcoming 2010 cruise -- visit Freedom Cruises.
 
Follow up Links
About Us
THE LIBERATOR ONLINE, created by James W. Harris and Paul Schmidt, is the official newsletter of the Advocates for Self-Government.

Mail: 1010 North Tennessee Street, Suite 215, Cartersville, GA 30120
Phone: 770-386-8372. For orders: 1-800-932-1776
Fax: 770-386-8373
Email: info@TheAdvocates.org
WWW: http://www.theadvocates.org
 
Read previous issues.

The Advocates for Self-Government is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational organization. Contributions to the Advocates are tax-deductible in the U.S.

"May it be to the world... to assume the blessings and security of self-government." -- Thomas Jefferson, June 24, 1826.
 
 
 

Read previous issues.

Subscribe today!

Make a secure, tax-deductible donation to help the cause of liberty!


Contents copyrighted © The Advocates for Self-Government,, a nonprofit 501(c)(3) educational organization. Donations tax-deductible in U.S. All rights reserved.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hit Counter