Cancel Register Now Reset Password?
Advocates for Self Government Logo

1010 N Tennessee St
Suite 215
Cartersville, GA
30120-8528

Phone

(770) 386-8372

Fax

(770) 386-8373

Orders & Donations

(800) 932-1776

Quick Contact

info@theadvocates.org

Sign up for our Liberator Online Newsletter

The Liberator Online is full of expert tips and libertarian discussion. It’s the best way to stay current on breaking libertarian news.





Feed_icon_large

The Invisible Hand Is a Gentle Hand

Published September 02, 2011 in Talking Points by Sharon Harris

The enemies of freedom have always maligned the free market. They have perpetuated myths like "dog-eat-dog capitalism," "survival of the fittest," "the law of the jungle." Robber barons. Heartless monopolies. A ruthless Wall Street fleecing a helpless Main Street.

Nonsense.

It's time to speak out for the free market and individual liberty.

The great economist Adam Smith wrote that a free society operates as if "an invisible hand" directs people's actions — in such a way as to serve the interest of the whole society.

That invisible hand is a gentle one. A free market is a gentle market. A free society is a gentle society. A cooperative, compassionate, and generous society. An abundant and tolerant society.

David Friedman, in his book The Machinery of Freedom, notes that there are only three ways to get something: (1) by trading, (2) by receiving a gift (from love or friendship), or (3) by force ("do what I want or I'll shoot you"). Honest, peaceful people operate in the first two ways. Criminals and the state operate by force, aggression, coercion.

The gentle invisible hand vs. the visible fist of force.

You want to see dog-eat-dog? Look at the notorious Kelo Supreme Court decision on eminent domain. The government now has the power to seize your home or business and turn it over to other private individuals.

You want to see dog-eat-dog? Look at the billions of dollars that are taken from American taxpayers every year and handed over to well-connected corporate interests.

You want to see dog-eat-dog? Look at an IRS audit.

We don’t have a dog-eat-dog business world; we have a dog-eat-dog government.

In truth, the marketplace has a civilizing, humanizing effect. If honesty didn't exist, the marketplace would invent it, because it's the most successful way to do business. In the free market we see, not a survival of the fittest, but a survival of the kindest. Survival of the most cooperative. Survival of the friendliest. A gentle Darwinism, if you will.

In a free society, the most considerate prosper. As Thomas Sowell says, "Politeness and consideration for others is like investing pennies and getting dollars back." A smile has currency.

There are built-in incentives in the marketplace for service, courtesy, respect. The invisible hand becomes a friendly handshake between cooperating adults. As John Stossel pointed out in his ABC special, "Greed," notice how — when you purchase something at a store — the clerk says, "Thank you," and you say "Thank you" as well? It's a mutually beneficial exchange, and both parties are better off.

The gentle invisible hand vs. the visible fist of government.


Would you rather visit Wal-Mart or the Department of Motor Vehicles? In part two, find out how the Gentle Hand of the Free-Market encourages cooperation while the Visable Fist of the Government does not.


Showing 1 Comment

Pubilshed December 31, 2011 by calEDGE

Gravatar I have recently become interested in libertarianism but I think libertarians are both extreme optimists and pessimists and refuse to see the world in shades of gray. They are optimists in that they assume that markets are self-regulating, self-sustaining, and if simply left alone would trend upward without the usual business cycle. The great depression show us that markets can align themselves in such a way that natural unemployment is not reached, meaning some external influence (i.e governments) needs to step in. Then I think they are pessimists on the way governments truly work. The purpose for governments is to promote the greater good (a loaded term I know) and if we work off the individualist framework that libertarians constantly frame their arguments in we see that market regulations are nessecary. Otherwise monopolies will arise, case in point the so-called Guilded Age, where the 'individual liberties' of the the railroad and steel barons weren't infringed upon by throwing the safety and economic security of common workers to the way side. I think these examples show that the argument should be 'to what extent should the government be in the economy', not 'should the government be in the economy?'

Add Comment

You commenting as a guest Sign in

Get your own Gravatar

Advocates for Self-Government 1010 N Tennessee St Suite 215 Cartersville, GA 30120-8528 Phone (770) 386-8372 Fax (770) 386-8373 Orders & Donations (800) 932-1776

Contents copyrighted © The Advocates for Self-Government, a nonprofit 501(c)(3) educational organization. Donations tax-deductible in U.S. All rights reserved.

Powered by Blacksnow Media